Key Takeaways
- You recover as long as your share of the fault is 50% or less. The bar under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116 applies only when your fault is more than 50%.
- At exactly 50% you still recover, at half. Anyone who tells you 50% ends the claim is describing a different state’s rule.
- Every percentage point is money. On a $100,000 award, each point costs $1,000, which is why adjusters argue so hard about small ones.
- The insurer’s percentage is an opening position, not a finding. Only a jury assigns fault, and only if the case is tried.
- The usual arguments against you are footwear, phone use, ignoring a warning sign, and being somewhere you should not have been. Each is answerable with evidence.
- Comparative fault does not shorten your deadline. Two years, or one against a public body, regardless of the fault fight.
The short answer
Illinois uses modified comparative negligence. If you share some of the blame for your fall, you still recover, but your damages are reduced by your share. You lose the right to recover entirely only if your share is more than 50%.
The statute is 735 ILCS 5/2-1116, and its wording matters. A plaintiff is “barred from recovering damages if the trier of fact finds that the contributory fault on the part of the plaintiff is more than 50% of the proximate cause of the injury,” and is expressly not barred where that fault “is not more than 50%.” So 50% is a recovering position. 51% is not.
What the arithmetic looks like
Take a fall claim a jury values at $100,000 in total damages, then apply the fault share.
| Your share of the fault | What you take home | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 0% | $100,000 | No reduction |
| 20% | $80,000 | Reduced in proportion |
| 49% | $51,000 | Reduced in proportion |
| 50% | $50,000 | Still recovering. “Not more than 50%” is expressly preserved |
| 51% | $0 | Barred. There is no partial recovery above the line |
Illustrative figures only. Source: 735 ILCS 5/2-1116.
The gap between the last two rows is the whole fight. One percentage point is the difference between half a case and no case, and it is decided by a jury, not by the adjuster who first put a number on your file.
It is worth being precise about the label, because the shorthand causes real confusion. Illinois is often described as a “51% bar” state, which is accurate, and just as often as a “50% rule” state, which is not. The bar falls at fault greater than half, so a plaintiff assessed at half the blame walks away with half the damages rather than nothing.
What is actually being divided
Comparative fault is not a judgment about who was more careless as people. It divides proximate cause: whose conduct actually produced this injury, and in what proportion. That distinction matters, because it means the property owner‘s failure and your own inattention are measured against the same question rather than against each other’s character.
It also means you have to establish the owner’s negligence first. Comparative fault reduces a claim; it never creates one. The elements you still have to prove are set out in our post on what a fall claim must prove, and notice is usually the hardest of them.
What the percentage is applied to
A fault share is a discount on a number, so the number matters as much as the percentage. In an Illinois fall claim the damages the reduction is applied to typically include past and future medical care, lost earnings and lost earning capacity, pain and suffering, loss of normal life, and disfigurement where it applies.
That is why arguing the percentage in isolation is a mistake. Accepting 30% fault on a claim valued properly can leave you far better off than accepting 10% on a claim the insurer has quietly undervalued. Both halves of the equation are negotiable, and the second half is where undertreatment or a thin medical record does the most damage.
The four arguments insurers actually make
- Footwear. Smooth soles, heels, sandals in winter. Answerable with the condition itself: if the surface was unreasonably dangerous, ordinary shoes are not a defense.
- Distraction, usually a phone. This one cuts both ways. Illinois recognizes a distraction exception in premises cases, where an owner should have expected a visitor’s attention to be drawn away. The same facts an adjuster uses against you can support the owner’s duty.
- A warning sign or cone. A sign is evidence, not immunity. The question stays whether reasonable care required more than a sign, and whether the warning was actually visible from where you were walking.
- You should not have been there. Worth taking seriously, because status still matters at the edges. Between lawful visitors it does not: 740 ILCS 130/2 abolished the invitee and licensee distinction, and all lawful entrants are owed reasonable care under the circumstances.
Illustrative figures. Source: 735 ILCS 5/2-1116.
How to protect your percentage
Fault percentages are argued from the record that exists, so the record is what to protect:
- Photograph the hazard and the approach, not just the spot. Sight lines show what you could reasonably have seen.
- Keep the shoes you were wearing, unworn and unwashed. They answer the footwear argument better than testimony.
- Ask in writing for video within days. It usually settles the distraction argument one way or the other.
- Do not guess in a recorded statement. “I wasn’t really paying attention” is a percentage, offered up for free.
- Get medical care promptly, because a treatment gap gets recast as a causation argument rather than a fault one.
When more than one party is to blame
Falls often have two or three possible defendants: the owner, the tenant who ran the business, and a maintenance or snow removal contractor. Illinois then splits the fault among all of them as well as you, and 735 ILCS 5/2-1117 decides who has to pay what.
- Medical expenses are different. All defendants found liable are jointly and severally liable for your past and future medical and medically related expenses. Any one of them can be pursued for the whole of that category.
- For everything else, the 25% line governs. A defendant whose fault is 25% or more of the total is jointly and severally liable for the remaining damages. A defendant whose fault is less than 25% is only severally liable, meaning responsible for its own share alone.
The practical consequence is worth understanding before you accept anyone’s version of the split. If a contractor is uninsured or out of business, the difference between it being assessed at 24% and 26% can decide whether you collect the rest of your damages from the remaining defendant or simply lose that portion. That is why the apportionment argument is not only about your own percentage.
What happens when you and the insurer disagree
Almost always, you will disagree. The adjuster’s number arrives early, before the evidence is complete, and it tends to be generous to their insured. Nothing about it is binding.
What follows is usually negotiation on the strength of the file. Photographs, video, inspection logs and prior complaints move the number; assertions do not. If the gap does not close, the realistic paths are mediation or filing suit, and filing is often what produces the documents that settle the fault question, because discovery compels what a request letter cannot.
Two things are worth keeping in view. First, most claims resolve without a trial, so the percentage that matters in practice is the one both sides think a jury would reach. Second, the deadline keeps running throughout, and an insurer’s willingness to keep talking does not extend it.
Snow and ice: a different first question
In a winter fall, comparative fault is usually the second question. The first is whether the owner owed a duty at all, because Illinois imposes none for a natural accumulation of snow or ice. Only once the accumulation is shown to be unnatural does the fault split matter. We deal with that in who is liable when you slip on ice.
Your deadline is unaffected
A fault dispute does not extend anything. A personal injury claim in Illinois generally runs two years under 735 ILCS 5/13-202, and one year under 745 ILCS 10/8-101(a) if the property belongs to a village, county, school district or park district. Serious falls can also mean a brain injury or another catastrophic injury, where the value at stake makes each percentage point worth far more than the example above.
Hurt in a fall and blamed for part of it?
On a $100,000 award, each point of fault costs you $1,000 of compensation, and the insurer’s number is only an opening position. You have two years, or one against a public body.
Call 847-800-8978Free case review →
Free personal injury consultation. No fee unless we win.
പതിവ് ചോദ്യങ്ങൾ
Can I still recover damages if I was partially at fault for my fall?
Yes, as long as your share of the fault is 50% or less. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116 your damages are reduced in proportion to your share, so a 20% share of a $100,000 award leaves $80,000. You are barred entirely only if a jury finds your fault was more than 50%.
What happens if I am found exactly 50% at fault in Illinois?
You still recover, and your damages are cut in half. The statute bars recovery only where the plaintiff’s fault is more than 50%, and it expressly preserves recovery where that fault is not more than 50%. Anyone describing 50% as the cutoff is describing a rule from another state.
Who decides my percentage of fault?
The trier of fact, meaning the jury in a tried case. An insurance adjuster’s percentage is a negotiating position, not a finding, and it is usually assigned early on incomplete information. Most claims settle, so in practice the number is negotiated in the shadow of what a jury would likely do.
Does using my phone when I fell destroy my claim?
Not automatically. It may increase your share of the fault, but Illinois premises law also recognizes a distraction exception, where a property owner should have expected that a visitor’s attention would be drawn away. The same facts an adjuster raises against you can support the owner’s duty to have made the area safe.
Does a warning sign mean the property owner is not liable?
No. A sign is evidence that the owner took some care, not immunity. The questions remain whether reasonable care under the circumstances required more than a sign, such as fixing or blocking off the hazard, and whether the warning was actually visible from where you were walking.
Does a fault dispute give me more time to file?
No. The deadline runs regardless of any argument about percentages. Illinois generally allows two years under 735 ILCS 5/13-202, and only one year under 745 ILCS 10/8-101(a) where the claim is against a local public entity such as a village, county, school district or park district.
Talk to an Elmwood Park slip and fall lawyer
The fault percentage is negotiated, and it is negotiated from evidence. Photographs of the approach, the shoes you were wearing and the video from that day are worth more to your share of the blame than any argument made months later.
If you were hurt in a fall in Elmwood Park, Oak Lawn, Skokie, Niles, Orland Park or anywhere in Cook County, Lawyer Furqan will tell you honestly where your percentage is likely to land and what would move it. We handle the full range of premises liability claims.
Sources and authorities cited
- 735 ILCS 5/2-1116 · modified comparative negligence, barred only above 50%, recovery preserved at “not more than 50%”
- 740 ILCS 130/2 · invitee and licensee distinction abolished, duty is reasonable care under the circumstances
- IPI Civil 120.00, Premises · the distraction exception, from Ward v. Kmart Corp., 136 Ill. 2d 132 (1990)
- 735 ILCS 5/2-1117 · joint and several liability, and the 25% line among multiple defendants
- 735 ILCS 5/13-202 · two-year limitation; 745 ILCS 10/8-101(a) · one-year limitation, local public entities
This article is general legal information about Illinois law, not legal advice, and creates no attorney-client relationship. Fault depends on the facts of each case, and the figures above are illustrative rather than a prediction of any result.
